Paper detail

Rehabilitating CIV-based black hole mass estimates in quasars

Currently, the ability to produce black hole mass estimates using the CIV 1549 line that are consistent with Hb mass estimates is uncertain, due in large part to disagreement between velocity line width measurements for the two lines. This discrepancy between Hb and CIV arises from the fact that both line profiles are treated the same way in single-epoch scaling relationships based on the assumption that the broad-line region is virialized, even though a non-virialized emission component is often significant in the CIV line and absent or weak in the Hb line. Using quasi-simultaneous optical and ultra-violet spectra for a sample of 85 optically bright quasars with redshifts in the range z=0.03-1.4, we present a significant step along the path to rehabilitating the CIV line for black hole mass estimates. We show that the residuals of velocity line width between CIV and Hb are significantly correlated with the peak flux ratio of SiIV+OIV] 1400 to CIV. Using this relationship, we develop a prescription for estimating black hole masses from the ultra-violet spectrum that agree better with Hb-based masses than the traditional CIV masses. The scatter between Hb and CIV masses is initially 0.43 dex in our sample and is reduced to 0.33 dex when using our prescription. The peak flux ratio of SiIV+OIV] 1400 to CIV is an ultraviolet indicator of the suite of spectral properties commonly known as "Eigenvector 1", thus the reduction in scatter between CIV and Hb black hole masses is essentially due to removing an Eigenvector 1 bias in CIV-based masses.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.