Paper detail

Regularized modified log-Sobolev inequalities, and comparison of Markov chains

In this work, we develop a comparison procedure for the Modified log-Sobolev Inequality (MLSI) constants of two reversible Markov chains on a finite state space. Efficient comparison of the MLSI Dirichlet forms is a well known obstacle in the theory of Markov chains. We approach this problem by introducing a {\it regularized} MLSI constant which, under some assumptions, has the same order of magnitude as the usual MLSI constant yet is amenable for comparison and thus considerably simpler to estimate in certain cases. As an application of this general comparison procedure, we provide a sharp estimate of the MLSI constant of the switch chain on the the set of simple bipartite regular graphs of size $n$ with a fixed degree $d$. Our estimate implies that the total variation mixing time of the switch chain is of order $O_d(n\log n)$. The result is optimal up to a multiple depending on $d$ and resolves a long-standing open problem. We expect that the MLSI comparison technique implemented in this paper will find further applications.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.