Regularization Properties of the Krylov Iterative Solvers CGME and LSMR For Linear Discrete Ill-Posed Problems with an Application to Truncated Randomized SVDs

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Abstract

For the large-scale linear discrete ill-posed problem min⁡∥Ax−b∥\min\|Ax-b\| or Ax=bAx=b with bb contaminated by Gaussian white noise, there are four commonly used Krylov solvers: LSQR and its mathematically equivalent CGLS, the Conjugate Gradient (CG) method applied to ATAx=ATbA^TAx=A^Tb, CGME, the CG method applied to min⁡∥AATy−b∥\min\|AA^Ty-b\| or AATy=bAA^Ty=b with x=ATyx=A^Ty, and LSMR, the minimal residual (MINRES) method applied to ATAx=ATbA^TAx=A^Tb. These methods have intrinsic regularizing effects, where the number kk of iterations plays the role of the regularization parameter. In this paper, we establish a number of regularization properties of CGME and LSMR, including the filtered SVD expansion of CGME iterates, and prove that the 2-norm filtering best regularized solutions by CGME and LSMR are less accurate than and at least as accurate as those by LSQR, respectively. We also prove that the semi-convergence of CGME and LSMR always occurs no later and sooner than that of LSQR, respectively. As a byproduct, using the analysis approach for CGME, we improve a fundamental result on the accuracy of the truncated rank kk approximate SVD of AA generated by randomized algorithms, and reveal how the truncation step damages the accuracy. Numerical experiments justify our results on CGME and LSMR.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.