Paper detail

Regularization Parameter Selection Method for Sign LMS with Reweighted L1-Norm Constriant Algorithm

Broadband frequency-selective fading channels usually have the inherent sparse nature. By exploiting the sparsity, adaptive sparse channel estimation (ASCE) algorithms, e.g., least mean square with reweighted L1-norm constraint (LMS-RL1) algorithm, could bring a considerable performance gain under assumption of additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN). In practical scenario of wireless systems, however, channel estimation performance is often deteriorated by unexpected non-Gaussian mixture noises which include AWGN and impulsive noises. To design stable communication systems, sign LMS-RL1 (SLMS-RL1) algorithm is proposed to remove the impulsive noise and to exploit channel sparsity simultaneously. It is well known that regularization parameter (REPA) selection of SLMS-RL1 is a very challenging issue. In the worst case, inappropriate REPA may even result in unexpected instable convergence of SLMS-RL1 algorithm. In this paper, Monte Carlo based selection method is proposed to select suitable REPA so that SLMS-RL1 can achieve two goals: stable convergence as well as usage sparsity information. Simulation results are provided to corroborate our studies.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.