Paper detail

Regularity results for a nonlinear elliptic-parabolic system with oscillating coefficients

In this paper we study the initial boundary value problem for the system $\mbox{div}(σ(u)\nablaφ)=0,\ \ u_t-Δu=σ(u)|\nablaφ|^2$. This problem is known as the thermistor problem which models the electrical heating of conductors. Our assumptions on $σ(u)$ leave open the possibility that $\liminf_{u\rightarrow\infty}σ(u)=0$, while $\limsup_{u\rightarrow\infty}σ(u)$ is large. This means that $σ(u)$ can oscillate wildly between $0$ and a large positive number as $u\rightarrow \infty$. Thus our degeneracy is fundamentally different from the one that is present in porous medium type of equations. We obtain a weak solution $(u, φ)$ with $|\nabla φ|, |\nabla u|\in L^\infty$ by first establishing a uniform upper bound for $e^{\varepsilon u}$ for some small $\varepsilon$. This leads to an inequality in $\nablaφ$, from whence follows the regularity result. This approach enables us to avoid first proving the Hölder continuity of $φ$ in the space variables, which would have required that the elliptic coefficient $σ(u)$ be an $A_2$ weight. As it is known, the latter implies that $\lnσ(u)$ is "nearly bounded".

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.