Paper detail

Regular variation of infinite series of processes with random coefficients

In this article, we consider a series $X(t)=\sum_{j \geq 1}Ψ_j(t) Z_j(t),t \in [0,1]$ of random processes with sample paths in the space $D=D[0,1]$ of càdlàg functions (i.e. right-continuous functions with left limits) on $[0,1]$. We assume that $(Z_j)_{j \geq 1}$ are i.i.d. processes with sample paths in $D$ and $(Ψ_j)_{j \geq 1}$ are processes with continuous sample paths. Using the notion of regular variation for $D$-valued random elements (introduced in Hult and Lindskog (2005)), we show that $X$ is regularly varying if $Z_1$ is regularly varying, $(Ψ_j)_{j \geq 1}$ satisfy some moment conditions, and a certain ``predictability assumption'' holds for the sequence $\{(Z_j,Ψ_j)\}_{j \geq 1}$. Our result can be viewed as an extension of Theorem 3.1 of Hult and Samorodnitsky (2008) from random vectors in $R^d$ to random elements in $D$. As a preliminary result, we prove a version of Breiman's lemma for $D$-valued random elements, which can be of independent interest.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.