Paper detail

Regular resolution for CNFs with almost bounded one-sided treewidth

We introduce a one-sided incidence tree decomposition of a CNF $φ$. This is a tree decomposition of the incidence graph of $φ$ where the underlying tree is rooted and the set of bags containing each clause induces a directed path in the tree. The one-sided treewidth is the smallest width of a one-sided incidence tree decomposition. We consider a class of unsatisfiable CNF $φ$ that can be turned into one of one sided treewidth at most $k$ by removal of at most $p$ clauses. We show that the size of regular resolution for this class of CNFs is FPT parameterized by $k$ and $p$. The results contributes to understanding the complexity of resolution for CNFs of bounded incidence treewidth, an open problem well known in the areas of proof complexity and knowledge compilation. In particular, the result significantly generalizes all the restricted classes of CNFs of bounded incidence treewidth that are known to admit an FPT sized resolution. The proof includes an auxiliary result and several new notions that may be of an independent interest.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.