Paper detail

Regular neutral networks outperform robust ones by reaching their top growth rate more quickly

We study the relative importance of "top-speed" (long-term growth rate) and "acceleration" (how quickly the long-term growth rate can be reached) in the evolutionary race to increase population size. We observe that fitness alone does not capture growth rate: robustness, a property of neutral network shape, combines with fitness to include the effect of deleterious mutations, giving growth rate. Similarly, we show that growth rate alone does not capture population size: regularity, a different property of neutral network shape, combines with growth rate to include the effect of higher depletion rates early on, giving size. Whereas robustness is a function of the principal eigenvalue of the neutral network adjacency matrix, regularity is a function of the principal eigenvector. We show that robustness is not correlated with regularity, and observe in silico the selection for regularity by evolving RNA ribozymes. Despite having smaller growth rates, the more regular ribozymes have the biggest populations.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.