Paper detail

Refinements of strong multiplicity one for $\mathrm{GL}(2)$

For distinct unitary cuspidal automorphic representations $π_1$ and $π_2$ for $\mathrm{GL}(2)$ over a number field $F$ and any $α\in\Bbb{R}$, let $\mathcal{S}_α$ be the set of primes $v$ of $F$ for which $λ_{π_1}(v)\neq e^{iα} λ_{π_2}(v)$, where $λ_{π_i}(v)$ is the Fourier coefficient of $π_i$ at $v$. In this article, we show that the lower Dirichlet density of $\mathcal{S}_α$ is at least $\frac{1}{16}$. Moreover, if $π_1$ and $π_2$ are not twist-equivalent, we show that the lower Dirichlet densities of $\mathcal{S}_α$ and $ \cap_α\mathcal{S}_α$ are at least $\frac{2}{13}$ and $\frac{1}{11}$, respectively. Furthermore, for non-twist-equivalent $π_1$ and $π_2$, if each $π_i$ corresponds to a non-CM newform of weight $k_i\ge 2$ and with trivial nebentypus, we obtain various upper bounds for the number of primes $p\le x$ such that $λ_{π_1}(p)^2 = λ_{π_2}(p)^2$. These present refinements of the works of Murty-Pujahari, Murty-Rajan, Ramakrishnan, and Walji.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.