Paper detail

Reexamination of constrains on the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution by Helioseismology

Nuclear reactions in stars occur between nuclei in the high-energy tail of the energy distribution and are sensitive to possible deviations from the standard equilibrium thermal-energy distribution, the well-known Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution (\textsf{MBD}). In a previous paper published in Physics Letters 441B(1998)291, Degl'Innocenti {\it et al}. made strong constrains on such deviations with the detailed helioseismic information of the solar structure. With a small deviation parameterized with a factor exp$[{-δ(E/kT)^2}]$, it was shown $δ$ restricted between -0.005 and +0.002. These constrains have been carefully reexamined in the present work. We find that a normalization factor was missed in the previous modified \textsf{MBD}. In this work, the normalization factor $c$ is calculated as a function of $δ$. It shows the factor $c$ is almost unity within the range 0$< δ\leq$0.002, which supports the previous conclusion. However, it demonstrates that $δ$ cannot take a negative value from the normalization point of view. As a result, a stronger constraint on $δ$ is defined as 0$\leq δ\leq$0.002. The astrophysical implication on the solar neutrino fluxes is simply discussed based on a positive $δ$ value of 0.003. The reduction of the $^7$Be and $^8$B neutrino fluxes expected from the modified \textsf{MBD} can possibly shed alternative light on the solar neutrino problem. In addition, the resonant reaction rates for the $^{14}$N($p$,$γ$)$^{15}$O reaction are calculated with a standard \textsf{MBD} and a modified \textsf{MBD}, respectively. It shows that the rates are quite sensitive even to a very small $δ$. This work demonstrates the importance and necessity of experimental verification or test of the well-known \textsf{MBD} at high temperatures.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.