Paper detail

Reevaluating of the feasibility of ground-based earth-mass microlensing planet detections

One important strength of the microlensing method in detecting extrasolar planets is its high sensitivity to low-mass planets. However, it is often believed that microlensing detections of Earth-mass planets from ground-based observation would be difficult due to the limit set by finite-source effects. This view comes from the previous estimation of the planet detection probability based on the fractional deviation of planetary signals, but proper probability estimation requires to additionally consider the source brightness, which is directly related to the photometric precision. In this paper, we reevaluate the feasibility of low-mass planet detections considering photometric precision for different populations of source stars. From this, it is found that contribution of the improved photometric precision to the planetary signal of a giant-source event is big enough to compensate the decrease of the magnification excess caused by finite-source effects. As a result, we find that giant-source events are suitable targets for Earth-mass planet detections with significantly higher detection probability than events involved with source stars of smaller radii and predict that Earth-mass planets would be detected by prospective high-cadence surveys.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.