Paper detail

Redundancies in Linear Systems with two Variables per Inequality

The problem of detecting and removing redundant constraints is fundamental in optimization. We focus on the case of linear programs (LPs), given by $d$ variables with $n$ inequality constraints. A constraint is called \emph{redundant}, if after its removal, the LP still has the same feasible region. The currently fastest method to detect all redundancies is due to Clarkson: it solves $n$ linear programs, but each of them has at most $s$ constraints, where $s$ is the number of nonredundant constraints. In this paper, we study the special case where every constraint has at most two variables with nonzero coefficients. This family, denoted by $LI(2)$, has some nice properties. Namely, as shown by Aspvall and Shiloach, given a variable $x_i$ and a value $λ$, we can test in time $O(nd)$ whether there is a feasible solution with $x_i = λ$. Hochbaum and Naor present an $O(d^2 n \log n)$ algorithm for solving the feasibility problem in $LI(2)$. Their technique makes use of the Fourier-Motzkin elimination method and the earlier mentioned result by Aspvall and Shiloach. We present a strongly polynomial algorithm that solves redundancy detection in time $O(n d^2 s \log s)$. It uses a modification of Clarkson's algorithm, together with a revised version of Hochbaum and Naor's technique. Finally we show that dimensionality testing can be done with the same running time as solving feasibility.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.