Paper detail

Reduction algorithm for the NPMLE for the distribution function of bivariate interval censored data

We study computational aspects of the nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator (NPMLE) for the distribution function of bivariate interval censored data. The computation of the NPMLE consists of two steps: a parameter reduction step and an optimization step. In this paper we focus on the reduction step. We introduce two new reduction algorithms: the Tree algorithm and the HeightMap algorithm. The Tree algorithm is only mentioned briefly. The HeightMap algorithm is discussed in detail and also given in pseudo code. It is a very fast and simple algorithm of time complexity O(n^2). This is an order faster than the best known algorithm thus far, the O(n^3) algorithm of Bogaerts and Lesaffre (2003). We compare our algorithms with the algorithms of Gentleman and Vandal (2001), Song (2001) and Bogaerts and Lesaffre (2003), using simulated data. We show that our algorithms, and especially the HeightMap algorithm, are significantly faster. Finally, we point out that the HeightMap algorithm can be easily generalized to d-dimensional data with d>2. Such a multivariate version of the HeightMap algorithm has time complexity O(n^d).

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.