Paper detail

Reduced Reference Quality Assessment for Point Cloud Compression

In this paper, we propose a reduced reference (RR) point cloud quality assessment (PCQA) model named R-PCQA to quantify the distortions introduced by the lossy compression. Specifically, we use the attribute and geometry quantization steps of different compression methods (i.e., V-PCC, G-PCC and AVS) to infer the point cloud quality, assuming that the point clouds have no other distortions before compression. First, we analyze the compression distortion of point clouds under separate attribute compression and geometry compression to avoid their mutual masking, for which we consider 5 point clouds as references to generate a compression dataset (PCCQA) containing independent attribute compression and geometry compression samples. Then, we develop the proposed R-PCQA via fitting the relationship between the quantization steps and the perceptual quality. We evaluate the performance of R-PCQA on both the established dataset and another independent dataset. The results demonstrate that the proposed R-PCQA can exhibit reliable performance and high generalization ability.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.