Paper detail

Reduced ML-Decoding Complexity, Full-Rate STBCs for 4 Transmit Antenna Systems

For an $n_t$ transmit, $n_r$ receive antenna system ($n_t \times n_r$ system), a {\it{full-rate}} space time block code (STBC) transmits $min(n_t,n_r)$ complex symbols per channel use. In this paper, a scheme to obtain a full-rate STBC for 4 transmit antennas and any $n_r$, with reduced ML-decoding complexity is presented. The weight matrices of the proposed STBC are obtained from the unitary matrix representations of Clifford Algebra. By puncturing the symbols of the STBC, full rate designs can be obtained for $n_r < 4$. For any value of $n_r$, the proposed design offers the least ML-decoding complexity among known codes. The proposed design is comparable in error performance to the well known perfect code for 4 transmit antennas while offering lower ML-decoding complexity. Further, when $n_r < 4$, the proposed design has higher ergodic capacity than the punctured Perfect code. Simulation results which corroborate these claims are presented.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.