Paper detail

Reduced Basis A Posteriori Error Bounds for the Instationary Stokes Equations

We present reduced basis approximations and rigorous a posteriori error bounds for the instationary Stokes equations. We shall discuss both a method based on the standard formulation as well as a method based on a penalty approach, which combine techniques developed in our previous work on parametrized saddle point problems with current reduced basis techniques for parabolic problems. The analysis then shows how time integration affects the development of reduced basis a posteriori error bounds as well as the construction of computationally efficient reduced basis approximation spaces. To demonstrate their performance in practice, the methods are applied to a Stokes flow in a two-dimensional microchannel with a parametrized rectangular obstacle; evolution in time is induced by a time-dependent velocity profile on the inflow boundary. Numerical results illustrate (i) the rapid convergence of reduced basis approximations, (ii) the performance of a posteriori error bounds with respect to sharpness, and (iii) computational efficiency.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.