Paper detail

Redshift-space equal-time angular-averaged consistency relations of the gravitational dynamics

We present the redshift-space generalization of the equal-time angular-averaged consistency relations between $(\ell+n)$- and $n$-point polyspectra of the cosmological matter density field. Focusing on the case of $\ell=1$ large-scale mode and $n$ small-scale modes, we use an approximate symmetry of the gravitational dynamics to derive explicit expressions that hold beyond the perturbative regime, including both the large-scale Kaiser effect and the small-scale fingers-of-god effects. We explicitly check these relations, both perturbatively, for the lowest-order version that applies to the bispectrum, and nonperturbatively, for all orders but for the one-dimensional dynamics. Using a large ensemble of $N$-body simulations, we find that our squeezed bispectrum relation is valid to better than $20\%$ up to $1h$Mpc$^{-1}$, for both the monopole and quadrupole at $z=0.35$, in a $Λ$CDM cosmology. Additional simulations done for the Einstein-de Sitter background suggest that these discrepancies mainly come from the breakdown of the approximate symmetry of the gravitational dynamics. For practical applications, we introduce a simple ansatz to estimate the new derivative terms in the relation using only observables. Although the relation holds worse after using this ansatz, we can still recover it within $20\%$ up to $1h$Mpc$^{-1}$, at $z=0.35$ for the monopole. On larger scales, $k = 0.2 h\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$, it still holds within the statistical accuracy of idealized simulations of volume $\sim8h^{-3}\mathrm{Gpc}^3$ without shot-noise error.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.