Paper detail

Redshift factor and diffusive equilibrium of unbound neutrons in the single nucleus model of accreting neutron star crust

Using a Wigner-Seitz approximation with spherical cells, we re-analyze a widely used single nucleus model of accreting neutron star crust. We calculate beta disequilibrium within the crust, which is sizable, and implies that neutron and baryon chemical potentials, $μ_n$ and $μ_{\rm b}$, are not equal. We include also non-equilibrium reactions, driven by matter compression, and proceeding in the reaction layers. The constancy of $e^Φμ_n$, where the spacetime metric component $g_{00}=e^{2Φ}$, in the shells between the reaction layers is not applicable, because single electron captures are blocked, so that the neutron fraction is fixed, and therefore neutrons are not an independent component of the crust matter. The absence of neutron diffusion in the shells between the reaction layers, stems from the constancy of the neutron fraction (concentration) in these shells. In the reaction layers, the outward force resulting from neutron fraction gradient is balanced by the inward gravitational force acting on unbound neutrons. Neglecting the thickness of the reaction layers compared to the shell thickness, we obtain condition $e^{Φ(r)}f_Q(r)g(r)=$constant, where $g$ is Gibbs energy per nucleon, undergoing discontinuous drops on the reaction surfaces, and $f_Q(r)g(r)={\widetilde{g}}(r)$ is a continuous function, due to the factor $f_Q(r)$ canceling the discontinuities (drops) in $g(r)$. The function $f_Q(r)$ is calculated using the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkov equations from $f_Q(P)$ and $g(P)$ obtained from the equation of state (EOS) with discontinuites. The constancy of of $e^{Φ(r)}{\widetilde{g}}(r)$ is an extension of the standard relation $e^{Φ(r)}{μ}_{\rm b}(r)=$constant, valid in hydrostatic equilibrium for catalyzed crust.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.