Paper detail

Redshift drift constraints on f(T) gravity

We explore the impact of the Sandage-Loeb (SL) test on the precision of cosmological constraints for $f(T)$ gravity theories. The SL test is an important supplement to current cosmological observations because it measures the redshift drift in the Lyman-$α$ forest in the spectra of distant quasars, covering the "redshift desert" of $2 \lesssim z \lesssim5$. To avoid data inconsistency, we use the best-fit models based on current combined observational data as fiducial models to simulate 30 mock SL test data. We quantify the impact of these SL test data on parameter estimation for $f(T)$ gravity theories. Two typical $f(T)$ models are considered, the power-law model $f(T)_{PL}$ and the exponential-form model $f(T)_{EXP}$. The results show that the SL test can effectively break the existing strong degeneracy between the present-day matter density $Ω_m$ and the Hubble constant $H_0$ in other cosmological observations. For the considered $f(T)$ models, a 30-year observation of the SL test can improve the constraint precision of $Ω_m$ and $H_0$ enormously but cannot effectively improve the constraint precision of the model parameters.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.