Paper detail

Rediscussion of eclipsing binaries. Paper X. The pulsating B-type system V1388 Orionis

V1388 Ori is an early-B type detached eclipsing binary whose physical properties have previously been measured from dedicated spectroscopy and a ground-based survey light curve. We reconsider the properties of the system using newly-available light curves from the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS). We discover two frequencies in the system, at 2.99 d$^{-1}$ and 4.00 d$^{-1}$ which are probably due to beta Cephei or slowly-pulsating B-star pulsations. A large number of additional significant frequencies exist at multiples of the orbital frequency, 0.4572 d$^{-1}$. We are not able to find a fully satisfactory model of the eclipses, but the best attempts show highly consistent values for the fitted parameters. We find masses of 7.24 +/- 0.08 Msun and 5.03 +/- 0.04 Msun, and radii of 5.30 +/- 0.07 Rsun and 3.14 +/- 0.06 Rsun. The properties of the system are in good agreement with the predictions of theoretical stellar evolutionary models and the Gaia EDR3 parallax if the published temperature estimates are revised downwards by 1500 K, to 19000 K for the larger and more massive star and 17000 K for its companion.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.