Paper detail

Rediscussion of eclipsing binaries. Paper IX. The solar-type system KIC 5359678

KIC 5359678 is a 6.231-d period F-type eclipsing binary system whose component stars both show starspot activity. It was observed by the Kepler satellite in long cadence for the full four-year duration of the mission. Wang et al (2021) obtained radial velocity measurements of the two stars and analysed these plus the Kepler data to study their spot activity and measure their physical properties, but left several questions unanswered. We have performed an independent analysis and determined the masses (1.252 +/- 0.018 and 1.065 +/- 0.013 Msun) and radii (1.449 +/- 0.012 and 1.048 +/- 0.017 Rsun) of the stars to high precision. The distance we find to the system is slightly shorter than that from Gaia EDR3 for unknown reason(s). We also investigated the precision of the numerical integration applied to the model light curve to match the 1765-s sampling cadence of the Kepler observations. We found that ignoring this temporal smearing leads to biased radius measurements for the stars: that for the primary is too small by 4 sigma and that for the secondary is too large by 10 sigma. Doubling the sampling rate of the model light curve is sufficient to remove most of this bias, but for precise results a minimum of five samples per observed datapoint is required.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.