Paper detail

Redefining the Phase Space for Ideal Gas Systems Resolves the Gibbs Paradox

For an ideal gas consisting N molecules within a volume V, the volume accessible to each molecule at an instantaneous time is V/N. The rest of the volume, (N-1)(V/N), is occupied by other (N-1) molecules. The textbook assumption that a molecule can access any location inside the volume V at one instantaneous in time is wrong leading to the Gibbs paradox. By taking into account the correct physical space for individual molecules, the partition function for the N-molecule system is obtained without using any correction factor which gives rise to the correct entropy of the system. There is thus no need to argue about the distinguishability of molecules. Entropy of mixing two quantities of ideal gasses is zero no matter the gasses are the same type or different types. With the appropriate assignment of the phase space, the entropy of the system has the expected property of being extensive and the Gibbs paradox is removed.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.