Paper detail

Red Giants in the Halo of the S0 Galaxy NGC 3115: A Distance and a Bimodal Metallicity Distribution

Using the Hubble Space Telescope, we resolve the red giant branch in the halo of the S0 galaxy NGC 3115. We measure magnitudes and $(V-I)$ colours for stars down to 1.5 magnitudes below the tip of the red giant branch. From the brightest stars we estimate a distance modulus $(m-M)_0=30.21 \pm 0.30$, corresponding to a distance of $11.0 \pm 1.5$ Mpc. This is in excellent agreement with the value $(m-M)_0=30.17 \pm 0.13$ determined from the planetary nebula luminosity function. Our results rule out the shorter distance modulus $(m-M)_0=29.65$ determined from surface brightness fluctuations. A histogram of $(V-I)$ colours shows a clear bimodality, indicating the presence of two distinct halo populations of roughly equal size. One has [Fe/H]$\sim -0.7$ and one has [Fe/H]$\sim -1.3$. This is the most distant galaxy in which a Population II halo has been resolved, and it is the first time a colour bimodality has been observed among the halo stars of any early-type galaxy.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.