Paper detail

Recursive cheating strategies for the relativistic $F_Q$ bit commitment protocol

In this paper, we study relativistic bit commitment, which uses timing and location constraints to achieve information theoretic security. We consider the $F_Q$ multi-round bit commitment scheme introduced by Lunghi et al. [LKB+15]. This protocol was shown secure against classical adversaries as long as the number of rounds $m$ is small compared to $\sqrt{Q}$ where $Q$ is the size of the used field in the protocol [CCL15,FF16]. In this work, we study classical attacks on this scheme. We use classical strategies for the $CHSH_Q$ game described in [BS15] to derive cheating strategies for this protocol. In particular, our cheating strategy shows that if $Q$ is an even power of any prime, then the protocol is not secure when the number of rounds $m$ is of the order of $\sqrt{Q}$. For those values of $Q$, this means that the upper bound of [CCL15,FF16] is essentially optimal.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.