Paper detail

Recurrent Averaging Inequalities in Multi-Agent Control and Social Dynamics Modeling

Many multi-agent control algorithms and dynamic agent-based models arising in natural and social sciences are based on the principle of iterative averaging. Each agent is associated to a value of interest, which may represent, for instance, the opinion of an individual in a social group, the velocity vector of a mobile robot in a flock, or the measurement of a sensor within a sensor network. This value is updated, at each iteration, to a weighted average of itself and of the values of the adjacent agents. It is well known that, under natural assumptions on the network's graph connectivity, this local averaging procedure eventually leads to global consensus, or synchronization of the values at all nodes. Applications of iterative averaging include, but are not limited to, algorithms for distributed optimization, for solution of linear and nonlinear equations, for multi-robot coordination and for opinion formation in social groups. Although these algorithms have similar structures, the mathematical techniques used for their analysis are diverse, and conditions for their convergence and differ from case to case. In this paper, we review many of these algorithms and we show that their properties can be analyzed in a unified way by using a novel tool based on recurrent averaging inequalities (RAIs). We develop a theory of RAIs and apply it to the analysis of several important multi-agent algorithms recently proposed in the literature.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.