Paper detail

Rectified Asteroid Albedos and Diameters from IRAS and MSX

Rectified diameters and albedo estimates of 1517 main belt asteroid selected from the IRAS and MSX asteroid photometry catalogues are derived from updated infrared thermal models, the Standard Thermal Model (STM) and the Near Earth Asteroid Thermal Model (NEATM), and Monte Carlo simulations, using new Minor Planet Center (MPC) compilations of absolute magnitudes (H-values) constrained by occultation and radar derived parameters. The NEATM approach produces a more robust estimate of albedos and diameters, yielding albedos of $p_{v}$(NEATM mean)$=0.081 \pm 0.064$. The asteroid beaming parameter ($η$) for the selected asteroids has a mean value of $1.07 \pm 0.27$, and the smooth distribution of $η$ suggests that this parameter is independent of asteroid properties such as composition. No trends in $η$ due to size-dependent rotation rates are evident. Comparison of derived $η$'s as a function of taxonomic type indicates the beaming parameter values for S-type and C-type asteroids are identical within the standard deviation of the population of beaming parameters.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.