Paper detail

Rectangular Seifert circles and arcs system

Rectangular diagrams of links are link diagrams in the plane ${\mathbb R}^2$ such that they are composed of vertical line segments and horizontal line segments and vertical segments go over horizontal segments at all crossings. P. R. Cromwell and I. A. Dynnikov showed that rectangular diagrams of links are useful for deciding whether a given link is split or not, and whether a given knot is trivial or not. We show in this paper that an oriented link diagram $D$ with $c(D)$ crossings and $s(D)$ Seifert circles can be deformed by an ambient isotopy of ${\mathbb R}^2$ into a rectangular diagram with at most $c(D) + 2 s(D)$ vertical segments, and that, if $D$ is connected, at most $2c(D)+2-w(D)$ vertical segments, where $w(D)$ is a certain non-negative integer. In order to obtain these results, we show that the system of Seifert circles and arcs substituting for crossings can be deformed by an ambient isotopy of ${\mathbb R}^2$ so that Seifert circles are rectangles composed of two vertical line segments and two horizontal line segments and arcs are vertical line segments, and that we can obtain a single circle from a connected link diagram by smoothing operations at the crossings regardless of orientation.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.