Paper detail

Recovery Risk: Application of the Latent Competing Risks Model to Non performing Loans

This article proposes a method for measuring the latent risks involved in the recovery process of non performing loans in financial institutions and business firms that deal with collection and recovery processes. To that end, we apply the competing risks model referred to in the literature as the promotion time model. The result achieved is the probability of credit recovery for a portfolio segmented into groups based on the information available. Within the context of competing risks, application of the technique yielded an estimation of the number of latent events that concur to the credit recovery event. With these results in hand, we were able to compare groups of defaulters in terms of risk or susceptibility to the recovery event during the collection process, and thereby determine where collection actions are most efficient. We specify the Poisson distribution for the number of latent causes leading to recovery, and the Weibull distribution for the time up to recovery. To estimate the model parameters, we use the maximum likelihood method. Finally, the model was applied to a sample of defaulted loans from a financial institution.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.