Paper detail

Recovering full coherence in a qubit by measuring half of its environment

When quantum systems interact with the environment they lose their quantum properties, such as coherence. Quantum erasure makes it possible to restore coherence in a system by measuring its environment, but accessing the whole of it may be prohibitive: realistically one might have to concentrate only on an accessible subspace and neglect the rest. If that is the case, how good is quantum erasure? In this work we compute the largest coherence $\langle \mathcal C\rangle$ that we can expect to recover in a qubit, as a function of the dimension of the accessible and of the inaccessible subspaces of its environment. We then imagine the following game: we are given a uniformly random pure state of $n+1$ qubits and we are asked to compute the largest coherence that we can retrieve on one of them by optimally measuring a certain number $0\leq a\leq n$ of the others. We find a surprising effect around the value $a\approx n/2$: the recoverable coherence sharply transitions between 0 and 1, indicating that in order to restore full coherence on a qubit we need access to only half of its physical environment (or in terms of degrees of freedom to just the square root of them). Moreover, we find that the recoverable coherence becomes a typical property of the whole ensemble as $n$ grows.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.