Paper detail

Reconstruction of the Tunguska Event of 1908: Neither an Asteroid, Nor a Comet Core

The Tunguska explosion occurred in the morning of June 30, 1908, in Central Siberia, some 800 km NNW from Lake Baikal. It devastated the forested area of 2150 sq. km, flattening and scorching some 30 million trees. Before this, a luminous body flew overhead in the cloudless sky. The air waves from the explosion were recorded as far as in London. The object that flew that morning over Siberia is usually designated the "Tunguska meteorite" or - more cautiously - the "Tunguska space body" (TSB). Certainly, this body was dangerous: the taiga was leveled over an area twice as large as New York City. The whole number of Tunguska hypotheses reaches a hundred, or so. But few of them have been built according to the standards of science and with due consideration of empirical data. There is also a serious methodological problem that is, as a rule, overlooked: the need to take into consideration all empirical data and to reconstruct the Tunguska event before building any models of it. Such a reconstruction is essential - since the consequences of this event are many and varied. The main Tunguska traces may be grouped and listed as follows: (a) material traces; (b) instrumental traces; (c) informational traces. To be sure that a proposed theory is correct, the scientist must check it against all the three types of Tunguska evidence. Having reconstructed the Tunguska event with due attention to all the evidence, we have to conclude that it could not have been an asteroid or a comet core. There seems to exist in space another type of dangerous space objects, whose nature still remains unknown.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.