Paper detail

Reconstruction of stop quark mass at the LHC

The cascade mass reconstruction approach was applied to simulated production of the lightest stop quark at the LHC in the cascade decay $\tilde{g} \to \sTop \, \Top \to \tildeχ_{2}^{0} \, \Top \, \Top \to \tilde{\ell}_{R} \, \ell \, \Top \, \Top \to \tildeχ_{1}^{0} \, \ell \, \ell \, \Top \, \Top$ with top quarks decaying into hadrons. The stop quark mass was reconstructed assuming that the masses of gluino, slepton and of the two lightest neutralinos were reconstructed in advance. A data sample set for the SU3 model point containing 400k SUSY events was generated which corresponded to an integrated luminosity of about 20 $\rm fb^{-1}$ at 14 TeV. These events were passed through the AcerDET detector simulator, which parametrized the response of a generic LHC detector. The mass of the $\tilde{t}_{1}$ was reconstructed with a precision of about $10\%$.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.