Paper detail

Reconstruction of glymphatic transport fields from subject-specific imaging data, with particular emphasis on cerebrospinal fluid flow and tracer conservation

The reconstruction of physically valid transport fields from subject-specific imaging data is a fundamental challenge in image-based computational modeling due to measurement noise, modeling uncertainties and discretization errors. Without a methodology to construct models that faithfully reflect the underlying physics, mechanistic understanding of complex biological systems is inherently limited. In this work, we address this challenge in the glymphatic system, the brain's waste-clearance network, where cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is transported through perivascular spaces into the brain parenchyma to facilitate metabolic waste removal. We introduce a computational framework for the high-fidelity reconstruction of subject-specific glymphatic transport fields from spatiotemporal imaging data. The formulation utilizes an advection-diffusion model with a velocity decomposition that imposes mass conservation, enabling the recovery of solenoidal (divergence-free) velocity fields through the solution of a constrained inverse problem. The system is discretized using immersed isogeometric analysis with quadratic B-spline basis functions, providing smooth, high-continuity solutions and inherent regularization of imaging noise. We demonstrate the framework's utility by using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of tracer transport in a mouse brain, obtaining spatially varying estimates of CSF velocity, diffusivity, and clearance parameters. Forward simulations using the recovered fields show close agreement with experimental observations, validating the framework's ability to characterize complex transport dynamics while preserving physical integrity. This approach provides a generalizable methodology for the robust inference of physically consistent transport fields from imperfect imaging data, with broad applicability to the image-guided modeling of biological and engineering systems.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.