Paper detail

Reconstruction and Normalization of Anselin's Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA)

The local indicators of spatial association (LISA) are significant measures for spatial autocorrelation analysis. However, there is an inadvertent fault in Anselin's mathematical processes so that the local Moran and Geary indicators do not satisfy his second basic requirement, i.e., the sum of the local indicators is proportional to a global indicator. Based on Anselin's original intention, this paper is devoted to reconstructing the calculation formulae of the local Moran indexes and Geary coefficients through mathematical derivation and empirical evidence. Two sets of LISAs were clarified by mathematical reasoning. One set of LISAs is based on no normalized weights and centralized variable (MI1 and GC1), and the other set is but the second the set cannot. Then, the third set of LISA was proposed, treated as canonical forms (MI3 and GC3). The local Moran indexes are based on global normalized weights and standardized variable based on population standard deviation, while the local Geary coefficients are based on global normalized weights and standardized variable based on sample standard deviation. This set of LISAs satisfies the second requirement of based on row normalized weights and standardized variable (MI2 and GC2). The results show that the first set of LISAs satisfy Anselin's second requirement,Anselin's. The observational data of city population and traffic mileage in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China were employed to verify the theoretical results. This study helps to clarify the misunderstandings about LISAs in the field of geospatial analysis.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.