Paper detail

Reconstruction Analysis of Galaxy Redshift Surveys: A Hybrid Reconstruction Method

In reconstruction analysis of galaxy redshift surveys, one works backwards from the observed galaxy distribution to the primordial density field in the same region, then evolves the primordial fluctuations forward in time with an N-body code. This incorporates assumptions about the cosmological parameters, the properties of primordial fluctuations, and the biasing relation between galaxies and mass. These can be tested by comparing the reconstruction to the observed galaxy distribution, and to peculiar velocity data. This paper presents a hybrid reconstruction method that combines the `Gaussianization'' technique of Weinberg(1992) with the dynamical schemes of Nusser & Dekel(1992) and Gramann(1993). We test the method on N-body simulations and on N-body mock catalogs that mimic the depth and geometry of the Point Source Catalog Redshift Survey and the Optical Redshift Survey. This method is more accurate than Gaussianization or dynamical reconstruction alone. Matching the observed morphology of clustering can limit the bias factor b, independent of Omega. Matching the cluster velocity dispersions and z-space distortions of the correlation function xi(s,mu) constrains the parameter beta=Omega^{0.6}/b. Relative to linear or quasi-linear approximations, a fully non-linear reconstruction makes more accurate predictions of xi(s,mu) for a given beta, thus reducing the systematic biases of beta measurements and offering further scope for breaking the degeneracy between Omega and b. It also circumvents the cosmic variance noise that limits conventional analyses of xi(s,mu). It can also improve the determination of Omega and b from joint analyses of redshift & peculiar velocity surveys as it predicts the fully non-linear peculiar velocity distribution at each point in z-space.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.