Paper detail

Reconstructing the redshift evolution of escaped ionizing flux from early galaxies with Planck and HST observations

While galaxies at $6 \lesssim z \lesssim 10$ are believed to dominate the epoch of cosmic reionization, the escape fraction of ionizing flux $f_\mathrm{esc}$ and the photon production rate $\dot n_γ$ from these galaxies must vary with redshift to simultaneously match CMB and low-redshift observations. We constrain $f_\mathrm{esc}(z)$ and $\dot n_γ(z)$ with Planck 2015 measurements of the Thomson optical depth $τ$, recent low multipole E-mode polarization measurements from Planck 2016, SDSS BAO data, and $3 \lesssim z \lesssim 10$ galaxy observations. We compare different galaxy luminosity functions that are calibrated to HST observations, using both parametric and non-parametric statistical methods that marginalize over the effective clumping factor $C_\mathrm{HII}$, the LyC production efficiency $ξ_\mathrm{ion}$, and the time-evolution of the UV limiting magnitude $dM_\mathrm{SF}/dz$. Using a power-law model, we find $f_\mathrm{esc} \lesssim 0.5$ at $z=8$ with slope $β\gtrsim 2.0$ at $68\%$ confidence with little dependence on the galaxy luminosity function or data, although there is non-negligible probability for no redshift evolution $β\sim 0$ or small escape fraction $f_\mathrm{esc} \sim 10^{-2}$. A non-parametric form for $f_\mathrm{esc}(z)$ evolves significantly with redshift, yielding $f_\mathrm{esc} \sim 0.2, 0.3, 0.6$ at $z=6,9,12$, respectively. However, a model-independent reconstruction of $\dot n_γ(z)$ predicts a suppressed escaped photon production rate at $z=9$ for the latest Planck data compared to the other models, implying a quicker period of reionization. We find evidence for redshift evolution in the limiting magnitude of the galaxy luminosity function for empirical models of the galaxy luminosity function.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.