Paper detail

Reconstructing solar magnetic fields from historical observations VIII. AIA 1600 Å contrast as a proxy of solar magnetic fields

The bright regions in the solar chromosphere and temperature minimum have a good spatial correspondence with regions of intense photospheric magnetic field. Their observation started more than a hundred years ago with the invention of the spectroheliograph. While the historical spectroheliograms are essential for studying the long-term variability of the Sun, the modern satellite-borne observations can help us reveal the nature of chromospheric brightenings in previously unattainable detail. Our aim is to improve the understanding of the relation between magnetic fields and radiative structures by studying modern seeing-free observations of far-ultraviolet (FUV) radiation around 1600 Å and photospheric magnetic fields. We used Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) observations of photospheric magnetic fields and Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA) observations of FUV contrast around 1600 Å. We developed a robust method to find contrast thresholds defining bright and dark AIA 1600 Å pixels, and we combine them to bright and dark clusters. We investigate the relation of magnetic fields and AIA 1600 Å radiation in bright and dark clusters. We find that the percentage of bright pixels entirely explains the observed variability of 1600 Å emission. We developed a multilinear regression model based on the percentages of bright and dark pixels, which can reliably predict the magnitude of the disk-averaged unsigned magnetic field. We find that bright and dark clusters closely correspond respectively to the populations of moderate (B > 55 G) and strong (B > 1365 G) magnetic field HMI clusters. The largest bright clusters have a constant mean unsigned magnetic field, as found previously for Ca II K plages. However, the magnetic field strength of bright clusters is 254.7$\pm$0.1 G, which is roughly 100 G larger than found earlier for Ca II K plages.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.