Paper detail

Reconstructing Reed-Solomon Codes from Multiple Noisy Channel Outputs

The sequence reconstruction problem, introduced by Levenshtein in 2001, considers a communication setting in which a sender transmits a codeword and the receiver observes K independent noisy versions of this codeword. In this work, we study the problem of efficient reconstruction when each of the $K$ outputs is corrupted by a $q$-ary discrete memoryless symmetric (DMS) substitution channel with substitution probability $p$. Focusing on Reed-Solomon (RS) codes, we adapt the Koetter-Vardy soft-decision decoding algorithm to obtain an efficient reconstruction algorithm. For sufficiently large blocklength and alphabet size, we derive an explicit rate threshold, depending only on $(p, K)$, such that the transmitted codeword can be reconstructed with arbitrarily small probability of error whenever the code rate $R$ lies below this threshold.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.