Paper detail

Reconsidering the galactic coordinate system

Initially defined by the IAU in 1958, the galactic coordinate system was thereafter in 1984 transformed from the B1950.0 FK4-based system to the J2000.0 FK5-based system. In 1994, the IAU recommended that the dynamical reference system FK5 be replaced by the ICRS, which is a kinematical non-rotating system defined by a set of remote radio sources. However the definition of the galactic coordinate system was not updated. We consider that the present galactic coordinates may be problematic due to the unrigorous transformation method from the FK4 to the FK5, and due to the non-inertiality of the FK5 system with respect to the ICRS. This has led to some confusions in applications of the galactic coordinates. We tried to find the transformation matrix in the framework of the ICRS after carefully investigating the definition of the galactic coordinate system and transformation procedures, however we could not find a satisfactory galactic coordinate system that is connected steadily to the ICRS. To avoid unnecessary misunderstandings, we suggest to re-consider the definition of the galactic coordinate system which should be directly connected with the ICRS for high precise observation at micro-arcsecond level.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.