Paper detail

Reconsideration of De Donder-Weyl theory by covariant analytic mechanics

We show that the covariant analytic mechanics (CAM) is closely related to the De Donder-Weyl (DW) theory. To treat space and time on an equal footing, the DW theory introduces $D$ conjugate fields ($D$ is the dimension of space-time) for each field and the CAM regards the differential forms as the basic variables. The generalization of the canonical equations is called the DW equations. Although one of the DW equations is not correct for the gauge field and the gravitational field, we show the way to improve it. By rewriting the canonical equations of the CAM, which are manifestly general coordinate covariant and gauge covariant, using the components of the tensors, we show that these are equivalent to the improved DW equations. Additionally, we investigate the Dirac field. We present a modified Hamilton formalism which regards only the Dirac fields as the basic variables and show that it provides the Dirac equations correctly.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.