Paper detail

Reconciling stellar dynamical and hydrostatic X-ray mass measurements of an elliptical galaxy with gas rotation, turbulence and magnetic fields

Recent hydrostatic X-ray studies of the hot interstellar medium (ISM) in early-type galaxies underestimate the gravitating mass as compared to stellar dynamics, implying modest, but significant deviations from exact hydrostatic equilibrium. We present a method for combining X-ray measurements and stellar dynamical constraints in the context of Bayesian statistics that allows the radial distribution of the implied nonthermal pressure or bulk motions in the hot ISM to be constrained. We demonstrate the accuracy of the method with hydrodynamical simulations tailored to produce a realistic galaxy model. Applying the method to the nearby elliptical galaxy NGC4649, we find a significant but subdominant nonthermal pressure fraction (0.27+/-0.06) in the central (<5 kpc) part of the galaxy, similar to the level of deviations from hydrostatic equilibrium expected in galaxy clusters. Plausible sources of systematic error, if important, may reduce this fraction. This would imply >360 km/s random turbulence or a magnetic field B=(39+/-6)(n_e/0.1 cm^{-3})^{0.59+/-0.09} muG, whereas gas rotation alone is unlikely to explain the detailed nonthermal profile. Future observations with Astro-H will allow turbulence or gas rotation at this level to be detected.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.