Paper detail

Reconciling observed GRB prompt spectra with synchrotron radiation ?

(abridged)Prompt GRB emission is often interpreted as synchrotron radiation from high-energy electrons accelerated in internal shocks. Fast synchrotron cooling predicts that the photon index below the spectral peak is alpha=-3/2. This differs significantly from the observed median value alpha \approx -1. We quantify the influence of inverse Compton and adiabatic cooling on alpha to understand whether these processes can reconcile the observations with a synchrotron origin. We use a time-dependent code that follows both the shock dynamics and electron energy losses. We investigate the dependence of alpha on the parameters of the model. Slopes between -3/2 and -1 are reached when electrons suffer IC losses in the Klein-Nishina regime. This does not necessarily imply a strong IC component in the Fermi/LAT range because scatterings are only moderately efficient. Steep slopes require that a large fraction (10-30%) of the dissipated energy is given to a small fraction (<~1%) of the electrons and that the magnetic energy density fraction remains low (<~ 0.1%). Values of alpha up to -2/3 can be obtained with relatively high radiative efficiencies (>50%) when adiabatic cooling is comparable with radiative cooling (marginally fast cooling). This requires collisions at small radii and/or with low magnetic fields. Amending the standard fast cooling scenario to account for IC cooling naturally leads to alpha up to -1. Marginally fast cooling may also account for alpha up to -2/3, although the conditions required are more difficult to reach. About 20% of GRBs show spectra with slopes alpha>-2/3. Other effects, not investigated here, such as a thermal component in the electron distribution or pair production by HE photons may further affect alpha. Still, the majority of observed GRB prompt spectra can be reconciled with a synchrotron origin, constraining the microphysics of mildly relativistic internal shocks.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.