Paper detail

Reconciling anomalous measurements in $B_s-\bar{B}_s$ mixing: the role of CPT-conserving and CPT-violating new physics

Recently observed anomalies in the $B_s \to J/ψϕ$ decay and the like-sign dimuon asymmetry $A^b_{sl}$ hint at possible new physics (NP) in the $\bsbsbar$ mixing. We parameterize the NP with four model-independent quantities: the magnitudes and phases of the dispersive part $M_{12}$ and the absorptive part $Γ_{12}$ of the NP contribution to the effective Hamiltonian. We constrain these parameters using the four observables $ΔM_s$, $ΔΓ_s$, the mixing phase $β_s^{J/ψϕ}$, and $A^b_{sl}$. Our quantitative fit indicates that the NP should contribute a significant dispersive as well as absorptive part. In fact, models that do not contribute a new absorptive part are disfavored at more than 99% confidence level. We extend this formalism to include CPT violation, and show that CPT violation by itself, or even in presence of CPT-conserving new physics without an absorptive part, helps only marginally in the simultaneous resolution of these anomalies. The NP absorptive contribution to $\bsbsbar$ mixing therefore seems to be essential, and would imply a large branching fraction for channels like $B_s \to τ^+ τ^-$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.