Paper detail

Reconciliation of Waiting Time Statistics of Solar Flares Observed in Hard X-Rays

We study the waiting time distributions of solar flares observed in hard X-rays with ISEE-3/ICE, HXRBS/SMM, WATCH/GRANAT, BATSE/CGRO, and RHESSI. Although discordant results and interpretations have been published earlier, based on relatively small ranges ($< 2$ decades) of waiting times, we find that all observed distributions, spanning over 6 decades of waiting times ($Δt \approx 10^{-3}- 10^3$ hrs), can be reconciled with a single distribution function, $N(Δt) \propto λ_0 (1 + λ_0 Δt)^{-2}$, which has a powerlaw slope of $p \approx 2.0$ at large waiting times ($Δt \approx 1-1000$ hrs) and flattens out at short waiting times $Δt \lapprox Δt_0 = 1/λ_0$. We find a consistent breakpoint at $Δt_0 = 1/λ_0 = 0.80\pm0.14$ hours from the WATCH, HXRBS, BATSE, and RHESSI data. The distribution of waiting times is invariant for sampling with different flux thresholds, while the mean waiting time scales reciprocically with the number of detected events, $Δt_0 \propto 1/n_{det}$. This waiting time distribution can be modeled with a nonstationary Poisson process with a flare rate $λ=1/Δt$ that varies as $f(λ) \propto λ^{-1} \exp{-(λ/λ_0)}$. This flare rate distribution represents a highly intermittent flaring productivity in short clusters with high flare rates, separated by quiescent intervals with very low flare rates.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.