Paper detail

Recommended Guidelines for Effective MOOCs based on a Multiple-Case Study

Massive Open Online Courseware (MOOCs) appeared in 2008 and grew considerably in the past decade, now reaching millions of students and professionals all over the world. MOOCs do not replace other educational forms. Instead, they complement them by offering a powerful educational tool that can reach students that, otherwise, would not have access to that information. Nevertheless, designing and implementing a successful MOOC is not straightforward. Simply recording traditional classes is an approach that does not work, since the conditions in which a MOOC student learns are very different from the conventional classroom. In particular, dropout rates in MOOCs are, normally, at least an order of magnitude higher than in conventional courses. In this paper, we analyze data from 7 successful MOOCs that have attracted over 150,000 students in the past years. The analysis led to the proposal of a set of guidelines to help instructors in designing more effective MOOCs. These results contribute to the existing body of knowledge in the field, bring new insights, and pose new questions for future research.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.