Paper detail

Recollements in stable $\infty$-categories

We develop the theory of recollements in a stable $\infty$-categorical setting. In the axiomatization of Beilinson, Bernstein and Deligne, recollement situations provide a generalization of Grothendieck's "six functors" between derived categories. The adjointness relations between functors in a recollement $\mathbf{D}^0\leftrightarrow \mathbf{D} \leftrightarrow \mathbf{D}^1$ induce a "recollée" $t$-structure $\mathfrak{t}_0\uplus\mathfrak{t}1$ on $\mathbf{D}$ , given $t$-structures $\mathfrak{t}_0,\mathfrak{t}_1$ on $\mathbf{D}^0, \mathbf{D}^1$. Such a classical result, well-known in the setting of triangulated categories, is recasted in the setting of stable $\infty$-categories and the properties of the associated ($\infty$-categorical) factorization systems are investigated. In the geometric case of a stratified space, various recollements arise, which "interact well" with the combinatorics of the intersections of strata to give a well-defined, associative $\uplus$ operation. From this we deduce a generalized associative property for $n$-fold gluing $\mathfrak{t}_0\uplus\cdots\uplus \mathfrak{t}_n$, valid in any stable $\infty$-category.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.