Paper detail

Recoiling Black Holes in Merging Galaxies: Relationship to AGN Lifetimes and Merger Remnant Properties

Central supermassive black holes (SMBHs) are a ubiquitous feature of locally-observed galaxies, and ample evidence suggests that the growth of SMBHs and their host galaxies is closely linked. However, in the event of a merger, gravitational-wave (GW) recoil may displace a SMBH from its galactic center, or eject it entirely. To explore the consequences of this phenomenon, we use hydrodynamic simulations of gaseous galaxy mergers that include a range of BH recoil velocities. We have generated a suite of over 200 simulations with more than 60 merger models, enabling us to identify systematic trends in the behavior of recoiling BHs -- specifically (i) their dynamics, (ii) their observable signatures, and (iii) their effects on BH/galaxy co-evolution. (i) Recoiling BH trajectories depend heavily on the gas content of the host galaxy; maximal BH displacements from the center may vary by up to an order of magnitude between gas-rich and gas-poor mergers. In some cases, recoil trajectories also depend on the timing of the BH merger relative to the formation of the galaxy merger remnant. (ii) Recoiling BHs may be observable as offset active galactic nuclei (AGN) via either kinematic offsets (v > 800 km s^-1) or spatial offsets (R > 1 kpc) for lifetimes of about 1 - 100 Myr. In addition, recoil events affect the total AGN lifetime. GW recoil generally reduces the lifetimes of bright AGN, but may extend lower-luminosity AGN lifetimes. (iii) Rapidly-recoiling BHs may be up to about 5 times less massive than their stationary counterparts. These mass deficits lower the normalization of the M - sigma relation and contribute to both intrinsic and overall scatter. Furthermore, recoil events displace AGN feedback from the galactic center, which enhances central star formation rates. This results in longer starburst phases and higher central stellar densities in merger remnants.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.