Abstract

A graph is kk-clique-extendible if there is an ordering of the vertices such that whenever two kk-sized overlapping cliques AA and BB have k−1k-1 common vertices, and these common vertices appear between the two vertices a,b∈(A∖B)∪(B∖A)a,b\in (A\setminus B)\cup (B\setminus A) in the ordering, there is an edge between aa and bb, implying that A∪BA\cup B is a (k+1)(k+1)-sized clique. Such an ordering is said to be a kk-C-E ordering. These graphs arise in applications related to modelling preference relations. Recently, it has been shown that a maximum sized clique in such a graph can be found in nO(k)n^{O(k)} time when the ordering is given. When kk is 22, such graphs are precisely the well-known class of comparability graphs and when kk is 33 they are called triangle-extendible graphs. It has been shown that triangle-extendible graphs appear as induced subgraphs of visibility graphs of simple polygons, and the complexity of recognizing them has been mentioned as an open problem in the literature. While comparability graphs (i.e. 22-C-E graphs) can be recognized in polynomial time, we show that recognizing kk-C-E graphs is NP-hard for any fixed k≥3k \geq 3 and co-NP-hard when kk is part of the input. While our NP-hardness reduction for k≥4k \geq 4 is from the betweenness problem, for k=3k=3, our reduction is an intricate one from the 33-colouring problem. We also show that the problems of determining whether a given ordering of the vertices of a graph is a kk-C-E ordering, and that of finding an ℓ\ell-sized (or maximum sized) clique in a kk-C-E graph, given a kk-C-E ordering, are complete for the parameterized complexity classes co-W[1] and W[1] respectively, when parameterized by kk. However we show that the former is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the treewidth of the graph.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.