Paper detail

Recognizing $k$-Clique Extendible Orderings

A graph is $k$-clique-extendible if there is an ordering of the vertices such that whenever two $k$-sized overlapping cliques $A$ and $B$ have $k-1$ common vertices, and these common vertices appear between the two vertices $a,b\in (A\setminus B)\cup (B\setminus A)$ in the ordering, there is an edge between $a$ and $b$, implying that $A\cup B$ is a $(k+1)$-sized clique. Such an ordering is said to be a $k$-C-E ordering. These graphs arise in applications related to modelling preference relations. Recently, it has been shown that a maximum sized clique in such a graph can be found in $n^{O(k)}$ time when the ordering is given. When $k$ is $2$, such graphs are precisely the well-known class of comparability graphs and when $k$ is $3$ they are called triangle-extendible graphs. It has been shown that triangle-extendible graphs appear as induced subgraphs of visibility graphs of simple polygons, and the complexity of recognizing them has been mentioned as an open problem in the literature. While comparability graphs (i.e. $2$-C-E graphs) can be recognized in polynomial time, we show that recognizing $k$-C-E graphs is NP-hard for any fixed $k \geq 3$ and co-NP-hard when $k$ is part of the input. While our NP-hardness reduction for $k \geq 4$ is from the betweenness problem, for $k=3$, our reduction is an intricate one from the $3$-colouring problem. We also show that the problems of determining whether a given ordering of the vertices of a graph is a $k$-C-E ordering, and that of finding an $\ell$-sized (or maximum sized) clique in a $k$-C-E graph, given a $k$-C-E ordering, are complete for the parameterized complexity classes co-W[1] and W[1] respectively, when parameterized by $k$. However we show that the former is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the treewidth of the graph.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.