Paper detail

Recent results on the low mass dark matter WIMP controversy: 2011

We review the confused situation concerning evidence for low-mass WIMPs. In the past one half year there have been new results concerning the existence of WIMPs at low mass including the new XENON 100, 100-day data, additional CDMS results, the publication of annual variation data from LVD and Borexino and new CoGeNT data. Along with the S2 analyses of the XENON 10 data we provide an overview of this situation. We discuss new results from 2011 here. We also discuss the origin of annual variations of signals in underground laboratories. This article is meant to be an update of recent experimental results. It is not a critical comparison of the claims of various experimental groups. Such critiques are made in public conferences and meetings. There is currently an intense discussion being carried out about the low mass WIMP region with many different viewpoints. We have little to say about this situation except that the scientific method usually insures the correct results will eventually surface.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.