Paper detail

Recent Attempts in the Analysis of Black Hole Radiation

In this thesis, we first present a brief review of black hole radiation which is commonly called Hawking radiation. The existence of Hawking radiation by itself is well established by now because the same result is derived by several different methods. On the other hand, there remain several aspects of the effect which have yet to be clarified. We clarify some arguments in previous works on the subject and then attempt to present the more satisfactory derivations of Hawking radiation. To be specific, we examine the analyses in the two recent derivations of Hawking radiation which are based on anomalies and tunneling; both of these derivations were initiated by Wilczek and his collaborators. We then present a simple derivation based on anomalies by emphasizing a systematic use of covariant currents and covariant anomalies combined with boundary conditions which have clear physical meaning. We also extend a variant of the tunneling method proposed by Banerjee and Majhi to a Kerr-Newman black hole by using the technique of the dimensional reduction near the horizon. We directly derive the black body spectrum for a Kerr-Newman black hole on the basis of the tunneling mechanism.We directly derive the black body spectrum for a Kerr-Newman black hole on the basis of the tunneling mechanism.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.