Paper detail

Recent Advances in Semileptonic B Decays

Aspects of the OPE-based QCD theory of B decays are discussed. We have at least one nontrivial precision check of the OPE at the nonperturbative level in inclusive decays. The data suggest proximity to the `BPS' limit for B mesons. Its consequences are addressed and their accuracy qualified. It is suggested that theory-wise B->D \ellνnear zero recoil offers an accurate alternative way to measure |V_{cb}|. It is shown that the OPE is in a good standing when confronted by experiment. The alleged controversy between theory and data on certain decay channels is found to be an artefact of oversimplifying the OPE in presence of high experimental cuts severely degrading the effective hardness. The effects exponential in the latter are missed in the traditionally used expressions, yet they do not signify a breakdown of the 1/m_b expansion proper. They typically increase the apparent b quark mass in B->X_s+γby 70 MeV or more, together with an even more dramatic downward shift in the kinetic expectation value. The utility of the second moment of E_γis emphasized once the aforementioned effects have been included. Incorporating them brings different measurements into a good agreement, provided the OPE-based theory employs the robust approach.

preprint2003arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.